Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence that he was the person who sold the drugs in question. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review because it was not advanced with specificity before the trial court in support of the defendant's motion to dismiss made at the close of the People's case (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.