1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 136 F.3d
  5. 136 F.3d 603 (1998)
 

TYLER v. CISNEROS

No. 97-15005.

136 F.3d 603 (1998)

James B. TYLER; Mary Ann Hartman; James F. Durfee; Edward A. Johnson; Andrew L. Solow, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Henry CISNEROS, Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation; Mission Housing Development Corporation, a California Corporation; 1010 SVN Associates, a California Limited Partnership; California Department of Parks and Recreation; Vincent Marsh, Secretary, San Francisco Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 10, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrea C. Ferster, Washington, DC, Laurel S. Stanley, Stanley & Rose, Berkeley, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James C. Kilbourne and Sean H. Donahue, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellee Cisneros.

Joseph M. Freschi, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee City and County of San Francisco.

Harry E. Turner and Eric S. Miller, O'Melveny & Myers, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees Mission Housing Development Corporation and 1010 SVN Associates.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, WALLACE and HALL, Circuit Judges.

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs James B. Tyler, et al., are homeowners who live in an area of San Francisco immediately surrounding the site of a low-income housing project to be constructed with federal funds. Plaintiffs argue that defendants-the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), City and County of San Francisco ("City"), Mission Housing Development Corporation ("Mission Housing"), and 1010 SVN Associates-failed to meet the terms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases