Ordered that the amended supplemental judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, it was not improper for the Judicial Hearing Officer (hereinafter the J.H.O.), to base the determination of the amount of his child support obligation upon his actual earning capacity, calculated by averaging his reported income for the five years immediately preceding 1995 (see, Murphy-Artale v Artale,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.