1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 586 N.W.2d
  5. 586 N.W.2d 141 (1998)
 

AMARAL v. SAINT CLOUD HOSP.

No. CX-98-784.

586 N.W.2d 141 (1998)

Michael A. AMARAL, et al., Appellants, v. The SAINT CLOUD HOSPITAL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted January 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Kempf, Susan E. Oliphant, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, L.L.P., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Kevin J. Hughes, Kevin M. O'Driscoll, Hughes, Mathews & Didier, P.A., St. Cloud, for respondent.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and SHORT, JJ.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants Dr. Michael A. Amaral and Dr. Dan E. Miulli argue that the district court erred in granting respondent The Saint Cloud Hospital's motion for summary judgment on the ground that under Minn.Stat. § 145.64, subd. 2 (1996), records relating to medical staff privileges are confidential. We affirm.

FACTS

Amaral and Miulli are neurosurgeons at Saint Cloud Hospital. They were denied authorization to perform...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases