OLIVER v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

No. B113027.

78 Cal.Rptr.2d 641 (1998)

66 Cal.App.4th 1397

Vincent OLIVER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent; Helix Information Services, Inc., et al., Interveners and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

Rehearing Denied October 30, 1998.

Review Denied December 22, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Kronemyer, Burbank, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich, Thomas W. Dressier, and Scott J. Rein, Los Angeles, for Interveners and Appellants.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, S. Robert Ambrose, Assistant County Counsel, Kevin C. Brazile, Principal Deputy County Counsel; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Martin Stein, and Barry M. Wolf, Beverly Hills, for Defendant and Respondent.


CROSKEY, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff Vincent Oliver ("plaintiff) and plaintiffs in intervention Helix Information Services, Inc. and Michael Hesse ("Helix" and "Hesse," respectively, or "intervenors") appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant County of Los Angeles ("the County"). In deciding the various motions for summary judgment filed by the parties, the trial court determined that a card game called "Newjack," which was invented by plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases