Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner was a passenger in a vehicle that was involved in a motor vehicle accident. At the time of the accident, the respondent had issued an automobile insurance policy to the petitioner's brother. We agree with the Supreme Court that the petitioner does not come within the definition of an "insured" in the uninsured motorist endorsement of the subject policy, and that the policy is not ambiguous. Thus, the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
