Smith asserts that the court of appeals erred by dismissing his petition. Smith's assertion, however, is meritless for the following reasons.
First, Smith's claims of erroneous jury instructions and verdict forms could have been raised in his direct appeal from his criminal convictions and sentences; habeas corpus is not available to raise these claims. Smith v. Seidner (1997),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.