Respondent's determination that petitioner, while off-duty, discharged multiple rounds from a gun he owned, other than his service weapon, failed to promptly report the incident and then made false and misleading statements concerning the incident is supported by substantial evidence. Ballistics evidence established that many of the shell casings found at the scene were fired from the gun in question. Other ballistics evidence stating that there was no indication of discharge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
