A.O. SMITH CORP. v. ALLSTATE INS. COS.

No. 96-3496.

222 Wis.2d 475 (1998)

588 N.W.2d 285

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Agristor Credit Corporation, a Delaware corporation and Agristor Leasing, a Wisconsin partnership, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Appellant, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Co-Appellant, WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided October 20, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Joseph D. McDevitt of Borgelt, Powell, Peterson & Frauen, S.C. of Milwaukee, Mitchell S. Goldgehn and James A. Smith of Aronberg, Goldgehn, Davis & Garmisa, of counsel, of Chicago, IL and Stephen M. Compton of Brennan, Steil, Basting & MacDougall, S.C. of Janesville. There was oral argument by Stephen M. Compton.

On behalf of the defendant-co-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Donald M. Lieb and Paul J. Pytlik of Otjen, Van Ert, Stangle, Lieb & Weir, S.C. of Milwaukee and Terry M. Cosgrove and Arthur J. McColgan, of counsel, of Chicago, IL. There was oral argument by Terry M. Cosgrove.

On behalf of the plaintiffs-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Scott W. Hansen of Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, S.C. of Milwaukee, and J.W. Montgomery III and Curt Vazquez of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue of Pittsburgh, PA. There was oral argument by J. W. Montgomery III. Professor Kenneth S. Abraham of Charlottesville, VA also participated on behalf of plaintiffs-respondents.

Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Myse, JJ.


WEDEMEYER, P.J.

Allstate Insurance Companies and Continental Casualty Company appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of A.O. Smith Corporation and its subsidiary, A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.1 The trial court granted Smith's motion seeking indemnification for defense costs and indemnification for underlying settlements, ruling that claims of fraud, conspiracy to defraud, and mail fraud alleged in several complaints...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases