1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 77 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 616 (1998)
 

MORILLION v. ROYAL PACKING CO.

No. H017212.

77 Cal.Rptr.2d 616 (1998)

Jose M. MORILLION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROYAL PACKING COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

Review Granted December 2, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, and David A. Rosenfeld, Piedmont and Amy D. Martin, Oakland, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Rynn & Janowsky and Lewis P. Janowsky and Bart M. Botta, Newport Beach, for Defendants and Respondents.

ELIA, Justice.

In this case, we must decide whether agricultural workers are entitled to compensation for the time they are required to spend commuting on their employer's buses. As we explain, we conclude that the commute time was not compensable. We therefore affirm the trial court's decision sustaining without leave to amend the employer's demurrer to the workers' first amended complaint.

Facts and Procedural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases