1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 246 A.D.2d
  5. 246 A.D.2d 442 (1998)
 

BELL v. BELL, KALNICK, KLEE & GREEN

246 A.D.2d 442 (1998)

668 N.Y.S.2d 177

Robert B. Bell, Respondent, v. Bell, Kalnick, Klee & Green et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 22, 1998

There is no merit to defendants' contention that in finding jurisdiction, the Special Referee improperly relied on CPLR 308 (2), a basis that had not been urged by plaintiff, instead of CPLR 310 (b), which was urged. For the reasons stated by the Second Department in Foy v 1120 Ave. of Ams. Assocs. (223 A.D.2d 232), the 1991 amendments to CPLR 310, at least insofar as they purport to provide easier "`alternative methods for personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases