1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 251 A.D.2d
  5. 251 A.D.2d 433 (1998)
 

PEOPLE v. SAGER

251 A.D.2d 433 (1998)

673 N.Y.S.2d 325

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Sager, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 8, 1998

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court's Sandoval ruling was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, People v Mattiace, 77 N.Y.2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 N.Y.2d 282, 292). The mere fact that a defendant has committed crimes similar to the one charged does not automatically preclude the prosecutor from using evidence of such crimes for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases