1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 606 (1998)
 

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE v. CITY OF MURRIETA

No. E020294.

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 606 (1998)

65 Cal.App.4th 616

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF MURRIETA et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

July 15, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harper & Burns and John R. Harper, Orange, for Defendants and Appellants.

McDermott, Will & Emery, George L. Hampton IV, Tambra Raush, William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel, and Lee A, Vinocour, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent

OPINION

GAUT, Associate Justice.

1. Introduction

On July 19, 1994, pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, section 33000 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code,1 the Murrieta City Council adopted Ordinance No. 121 approving a redevelopment project involving 3,788.19 acres of land. Subsequently, 200 acres of vacant county land were eliminated from the project area, thus reducing the amount of property affected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases