CHIU v. HOYDAL


248 A.D.2d 426 (1998)

668 N.Y.S.2d 948

Tommy Chiu, Appellant, v. Asbjorn Hoydal et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 9, 1998


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Although the note secured by the mortgage included a provision requiring the mortgagors to pay counsel fees of 15% of all sums due in the event that the note was subject to collection, the appellant is not entitled to such a fee as a matter of law as this provision was not included in the mortgage instrument itself (see, Vardy Holding Co. v Metric Resales, 131...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases