Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the hearing court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus motion under Indictment No. 484/93 which was to suppress physical evidence. However, the defendant "expressly and voluntarily waived [his] right to appellate review of [his] suppression motion by consenting to withdraw all * * * decided motions at the time [his] plea was entered. Accordingly, as there exists no suppression...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
