Defendant's claims of malpractice, insofar as based on plaintiff's alleged negligence in its representation of defendant in the arbitration, were properly dismissed in view of the testimony of defendant's successor attorney that he was able to present all of defendant's claims and evidence at the arbitration, negating any claim that the unfavorable result of the arbitration was proximately caused by the alleged negligence (see, Plentino Realty v Gitomer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PARKER DURYEE ROSOFF & HAFT v. ARISS
250 A.D.2d 414 (1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 11
Parker Duryee Rosoff & Haft, Respondent, v. David Ariss, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 12, 1998
May 12, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
