AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO. v. McCARTHY


246 A.D.2d 406 (1998)

666 N.Y.S.2d 432

Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Plaintiff, v. Dorothy McCarthy, Doing Business as Dorothy McCarthy Special II, Appellant, and Arthur Hawkins, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 15, 1998


Since Hawkins' cross claim did not demand an answer, its allegations are to be deemed denied or avoided (CPLR 3011), and, accordingly, the granting of Hawkins' motion for summary judgment on his cross claim was not premature simply because a formal answer thereto was never interposed. On the merits, the motion court properly determined that DMCII was bound by Stipulation No. 3, as amended by Stipulation No. 4, because its agent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases