Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting renewal. The plaintiffs offered an affidavit of merit and an acceptable excuse for failing to previously submit proof of certain facts. Additionally, the equities of this matter, as well as the interests of justice, were properly served by permitting renewal (see, Petito v Verrazano Contr. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.