Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his statements to the police should have been suppressed because they were the product of an illegal detention and arrest. Since the defendant did not raise the issue of whether his statements were the product of custodial interrogation at the suppression hearing, his claim is
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.