The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress his videotaped statement. Although defendant's first statement was suppressed because it was made at the time of his arrest without prior administration of Miranda warnings, defendant made his post-Miranda videotaped statement to an Assistant District Attorney at Central Booking after a definite pronounced break in the interrogation during which he slept at the precinct (see, People v...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.