U.S. EX REL. KIRSCH v. ARMFIELD

No. CIV.A. 93-1101.

56 F.Supp.2d 588 (1998)

UNITED STATES ex rel. Gary KIRSCH, Plaintiffs, v. Samuel ARMFIELD III, M.D., Vascusonics, Inc., and Penn Vascular Lab, P.C., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

November 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Tomas Rhodus, Albert W. Schollaert (U.S.A.), Michael F. Hertz (U.S. Dept. of Justice), Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Edward A. Olds, James B. Lieber, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants.


OPINION

ZIEGLER, Chief Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion (doc. no. 59) of plaintiff, the United States, to dismiss defendants' counterclaim for setoff for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The United States contends that the court lacks jurisdiction over the claim because, as a jurisdictional prerequisite, defendants have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies with the Health...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases