JANIS v. CALIFORNIA STATE LOTTERY COM

No. B115300.

80 Cal.Rptr.2d 549 (1998)

68 Cal.App.4th 824

Jack M. JANIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA STATE LOTTERY COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

Review Denied March 9, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wasserman, Comden & Casselman, Clifford H. Pearson, Gary S. Soter, Tarzana; Girardi & Keese, Thomas V. Girardi and James B. Kropff, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Linda A. Cabatic, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Paul H. Dobson and Ramon M. de la Guardia, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent California State Lottery Commission.

Landels, Ripley & Diamond, Mathew J. Geyer, Gregory L. Germain; Williams & Connolly, David Povich and William R. Murray, Jr., Washington, DC, for Defendant and Respondent GTECH Corporation.


LILLIE, P.J.

Jack and Linda Janis (Janis) appeal judgments dismissing their class action against the California State Lottery Commission (CSL) and GTECH Corporation (GTECH). Janis sought to recover moneys lost by Keno players during the four years CSL operated the lottery "Keno" game. The issues on appeal are whether: (1) Janis's appeal of the judgment in favor of GTECH is timely; (2) CSL is immune from liability on Janis's contract rescission and restitution claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases