The trial court erred in holding that its evidentiary ruling at trial, precluding proposed cross-examination of prosecution witness Omer Hodzic regarding inconsistent statements or omissions of material facts, was error of a type that required reversal as a matter of law.
At trial, the testimony of the victims, Esperanza Bautista and her sister Juana Bautista, established that at approximately 8:30 A.M. on October 29, 1994, after hearing a knock on
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.