1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 249 A.D.2d
  5. 249 A.D.2d 371 (1998)
 

KRAUS v. ROTEM

249 A.D.2d 371 (1998)

670 N.Y.S.2d 367

Harold Kraus et al., Respondents, v. Chaim Rotem et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 13, 1998

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Due to the defendants' failure to register an objection to the jury's verdict on the ground of inconsistency prior to the dismissal of the jury, at which time corrective measures could have been taken, their contention that the verdict was inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Barry v Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803). In any event, the verdict "was not necessarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases