CAHNMANN v. SPRINT CORP.

No. 97-2088.

133 F.3d 484 (1998)

Suzanne CAHNMANN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 7, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Stein, III (argued), Krislov & Associates, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

David A. Shaneyfelt, Hoogendoorn, Talbot, Davids & Godfrey, Chicago, IL, Brant M. Laue (argued), Shank, Laue & Hamilton, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and EASTERBROOK and KANNE, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Chief Judge.

Sprint, a communications common carrier regulated by the FCC, was sued by customers of Sprint's "Fridays Free" long-distance calling promotion in a class action originally filed in an Illinois state court. The suit was removed to federal district court, and judgment was soon entered for Sprint. The district judge ruled that although the complaint does not allege any violation of federal law and there is no diversity of citizenship, the suit was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases