ORLANDO v. ARCADE CLEANING CORP.


253 A.D.2d 362 (1998)

676 N.Y.S.2d 164

Daniel Orlando, Respondent, v. Arcade Cleaning Corp., by its Successor in Interest, Initial Contract Services, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 6, 1998


The injured plaintiff's motion for sanctions was motivated by Initial's counsel's failure to produce certain documents, his instructions to a client at deposition not to answer certain questions he considered irrelevant or nonspecific, and his failure to produce — at the court's direction — another witness better able to answer the questions. The IAS Court viewed such "obstructive" conduct as evidence of "wilful and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases