STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DAVID EISENMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 17, 1997.
Decided May 14, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Susan Brody, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Ivelisse Torres, Public Defender, attorney; Ms. Brody and Barbara A. Hedeen, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the briefs).
Paul H. Heinzel, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.
This appeal presents two issues for resolution. The first, whether defendant's criminal prosecution for absconding from parole is barred by principles of double jeopardy and fundamental fairness because of the Parole Board's prior revocation of his parole for substantially the same conduct, is virtually indistinguishable from the issue raised and resolved in State v....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.