1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 309 N.J.
  5. 309 N.J. Super. 305 (1998)
 

CAMP v. JIFFY LUBE # 114

309 N.J. Super. 305 (1998)

WILLIAM CAMP AND LISA CAMP, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JIFFY LUBE # 114, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas M. Joyce, argued the cause for appellants (Cahill, Wilinski & Rhodes, attorneys; John R. Mininno, on the brief).

Bernard J. Tkaczynski, argued the cause for respondent (Edward H. Keiper, attorney; Mr. Tkaczynski, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, MUIR, Jr., and KESTIN.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether the trial court properly charged the jury on proximate cause. We conclude the charge was improper. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

The essential facts giving rise to the appeal began on July 13, 1993, when William Camp (plaintiff1) left his 1989 Chevrolet at defendant's facility for a routine oil change...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases