Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the joinder of the theft-related counts with the drug possession count in this case was legally erroneous, since at trial he never challenged the joinder as being either violative of CPL 200.20 (2) or otherwise unlawful (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.