Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court, in effect, to modify the order entered October 24, 1996, and allow the defendants additional time to comply with an order directing production of a witness for the court-ordered deposition (see generally, CPLR 3126; Harris v City of New York,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.