1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 584 N.W.2d
  5. 584 N.W.2d 11 (1998)
 

STATE v. LEE

Nos. C2-98-21, C4-98-22.

584 N.W.2d 11 (1998)

STATE of Minnesota, City of Robbinsdale, Respondent, v. Gary S. LEE, (C2-98-21), Lawrence A. Banasik, (C4-98-22), Appellant,

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 22, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, St. Paul; and Paul D. Baertschi, Tallen & Baertschi, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Terry H. Rueb, Rueb & Karl Law Office, Burnsville, for appellants.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., AMUNDSON and WILLIS, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

In a consolidated appeal, appellants challenge the district court's determination that respondent's restriction ordinance does not violate their constitutional rights. Appellant Banasik also challenges the district court's determination that respondent is not estopped from enforcing the ordinance against him.

FACTS

Appellants Gary S. Lee and Lawrence A. Banasik are owner-operators of semi-truck tractors that weigh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases