The trial court accorded defendant sufficient latitude for inquiry into possible drug use by a prosecution witness (see, People v Melcherts,
The trial court properly admitted testimony that appellant had stated, before the robbery occurred, that he planned to rob a Pepsi truck. This statement was neither vague nor remote, and was highly probative. Appellant's challenge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.