PURYEAR v. GOLDEN BEAR INS. CO.

No. C026773.

78 Cal.Rptr.2d 507 (1998)

66 Cal.App.4th 1188

Leland S. PURYEAR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOLDEN BEAR INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Rehearing Denied October 20, 1998.

Review Denied December 22, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert L. Boasberg, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Schuering, Zimmerman & Scully, Leo H. Schuering, Jr., Douglas L. Smith, and Christian Koster, Sacramento, for Defendants and Respondents.


BLEASE, Acting Presiding Justice.

Leland Puryear (Puryear) appeals from a summary judgment granted defendants in his malicious prosecution action.

The trial court reasoned that defendants Golden Bear Insurance Company (Golden Bear) and Jones & Dyer, Golden Bear's counsel in the underlying lawsuit, had probable cause to sue Puryear personally because of confusion over the correct individual or entity legally responsible for the acts of an insurance brokerage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases