AINBINDER v. CHERNIS


248 A.D.2d 337 (1998)

669 N.Y.S.2d 829

Robert Ainbinder, Appellant, v. Paul Chernis, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 2, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that in reality the plaintiff's complaint asserted a claim of legal malpractice, not fraud (see, Garber v Ravitch, 186 A.D.2d 361), and, thus, was barred by the Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 214 [6]; see also, Panigeon v Aliance Nav. Line, 1997 WL 473385 [US Dist Ct,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases