The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's credibility determinations (see, People v Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94).
Closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officer was justified by his testimony that he was presently involved in ongoing investigations in the area in which this case occurred, that he continues to act as an undercover officer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.