1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 133 F.3d
  5. 133 F.3d 451 (1998)
 

ZACK v. U.S.

No. 96-2089.

133 F.3d 451 (1998)

William D. ZACK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce S. Menken (argued and briefed), Shelly A. Stasson, West Bloomfield, Michigan, William D. Zack, Troy, MI, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Peter A. Caplan (argued), Patricia G. Blake (briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: KENNEDY, JONES, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner, William D. Zack, appeals the denial of his motion, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, to extend the time to file a notice of appeal from a judgment denying a motion to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court held that Rule 4(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is the sole provision under which a party who has failed to receive prompt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases