Since petitioner did not raise this specific issue before the writ court, his contention that commencement of a third extradition effort was barred by CPLR 3217 (c), as twice previously discontinued, has not been preserved for appellate review. Were we to review this claim, we would find it to be without merit. Reading the statutory scheme concerning extradition as a whole and in light of the unique characteristics of extradition (see, CPL 570.48, 570.64), we do not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
