1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 57 F.Supp.2d
  5. 57 F.Supp.2d 522 (1998)
 

AT&T CORP. v. U.S.P.S.

No. 96 C 4573.

57 F.Supp.2d 522 (1998)

AT & T CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

September 29, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fay Clayton, Robinson, Curley & Clayton, P.C., Chicago, IL, Ron R. Hutchinson, Gerard F. Doyle, Todd R. Metz, Doyle & Bachman, Washington, DC, for AT & T Corp., plaintiffs

Robert T. Oleszkiewicz, Dennis J. Aukstik, John J. George, Michael Daley, Chris Anthony Leach, Mark G. Vanecko, Richard A. Toth, Catherine Wilson Murnane, Daley & George Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Public Communications Services, intervenor.

Matthew David Tanner, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for United States Postal Service, defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

AT & T has brought this action against the United States Postal Service, claiming that the Postal Service violated provisions of the Postal Service Procurement Manual by entering into certain contracts for the management of pay telephones at various Postal Service facilities. The Postal Service has moved for summary judgment,1 arguing that (1) a Postal Service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases