HOCKERSON-HALBERSTADT, INC. v. NIKE, INC.

No. Civ.A. 91-1720.

4 F.Supp.2d 573 (1998)

HOCKERSON-HALBERSTADT, INC. v. NIKE, INC., et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

March 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Hackett, Stephen Lewis Dunne, Hacket & Associates, Michael Douglas Carbo, Didriksen & Carbo, James E. Uschold, James E. Uschold, PLC, New Orleans, LA, Donald Lee Nauman, Santa Rosa, CA, for Plaintiff.

Gerald Edward Meunier, Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier, Noriea & Warshauer, Energy Centre, New Orleans, LA, Rodger L. Tate, Banner, Birch, et al., Washington, DC, Ruth Lynette Wylie, Seed & Berry, Seattle, WA, James Forrest Hinton, Jr., New Orleans, LA, Lawrence B. Mandala, McGlinchey Stafford P.L.L.C., Dallas, TX, Stephen R. Doody, Sessions & Fishman, New Orleans, for Defendants.


ORDER AND REASON

FALLON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Hockerson-Halberstadt Inc. ("HHI"), brings this suit alleging that the defendant, Converse, Inc. ("Converse"), infringed reexamined Hockerson U.S. Patent B1 4,322,895 (the "reexamined '895 patent"). Defendant denies infringement and moves for summary judgment contending that the reexamined patent is invalid as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 305...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases