1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 78 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 78 Cal.Rptr.2d 494 (1998)
 

MANFREDI & LEVINE v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B117626.

78 Cal.Rptr.2d 494 (1998)

66 Cal.App.4th 1128

MANFREDI & LEVINE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the County of Ventura, Respondent; Steven Barles et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

September 23, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manfredi & Levine, Mary J. Rettberg, Matthew R. Eccles, Karpman & Associates and Diane L. Karpman, Westlake Village, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Kevin H. Louth, Ventura, Pyfrom & Associates and Gregory C. Pyfrom, for: Real Parties in Interest Gary Podolny and Julie Podolny.

Steven and Sandra Barles, in pro. per., for Real Parties in Interest.

GILBERT, Associate Justice.

Here, trial counsel moved to be relieved because of an ethical conflict. When counsel told the court he would not disclose any information concerning the conflict, the court summarily denied the motion. There was no abuse of discretion and we deny the writ of mandate.

FACTS

Real parties Steven and Sandra Barles ("the Barleses") retained petitioner law firm, Manfredi & Levine, ("Manfredi"), as their counsel. On August...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases