1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 247 A.D.2d
  5. 247 A.D.2d 318 (1998)
 

TODTMAN, YOUNG, TUNICK, NACHAMIE, HENDLER, SPIZZ & DROGIN v. RICHARDSON

247 A.D.2d 318 (1998)

672 N.Y.S.2d 87

Todtman, Young, Tunick, Nachamie, Hendler, Spizz & Drogin, P. C. v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 24, 1998

On July 10, 1997, we reversed the dismissal of this action for attorneys' fees on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and reinstated the complaint. (231 A.D.2d 1.) The motion to dismiss was made after the parties, on January 25, 1995, had agreed, on the record, to arbitrate their dispute and had agreed to the selection of then Dean Frank J. Macchiarola as arbitrator. Although the complaint has been reinstated and leave to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases