1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 256 A.D.2d
  5. 256 A.D.2d 307 (1998)
 

GOYZUETA v. URBAN HEALTH PLAN, INC.

256 A.D.2d 307 (1998)

681 N.Y.S.2d 761

FRANZ GOYZUETA, Appellant, v. URBAN HEALTH PLAN, INC., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 7, 1998.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While it generally is true that a motion to renew must be based on newly-discovered facts, courts have discretion to grant this relief in the interest of justice, although not all of the requirements are met (see, Strong v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Ctr., 240 A.D.2d 726; Oremland v Miller Minutemen Constr. Corp.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases