MALDONADO v. MARYLAND RAIL


91 N.Y.2d 467 (1998)

695 N.E.2d 700

672 N.Y.S.2d 831

Carlos Maldonado et al., Appellants, v. Maryland Rail Commuter Service Administration, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Carlos Maldonado et al., Appellants, v. Mass Transit Administration, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ziff, Weiermiller, Hayden & Mustico, L. L. P., Elmira (James G. Levins, III, of counsel), for appellants.

Personius, Prechtl, Mattison, Palmer & Brockway, Elmira (William R. Palmer of counsel), for Mass Transit Administration, respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur.


BELLACOSA, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether a dismissed action, in which a nonexistent entity was named as a defendant and no proper service of process was accomplished, may be recommenced against the intended defendant pursuant to CPLR 306-b (b). Supreme Court denied defendant Maryland Mass Transit Authority's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' second effort. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases