CHALFIN v. SABOL


247 A.D.2d 309 (1998)

669 N.Y.S.2d 45

Rose Chalfin, by Her Attorney-in-Fact, Edith Jaffe, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Barbara Sabol, as Administrator of The New York City Human Resources Administration, et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 24, 1998


We have previously held the contested Regulation invalid to the extent indicated (Seittelman v Sabol, supra) and see no reason now to depart from that holding, particularly since the arguments presented on the present appeal are, for the most part, no different from those we expressly and painstakingly rejected on the prior appeal.

Adhering to Seittelman in other relevant respects, we find

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases