The court's ruling allowing testimony of the victim's daughter, who was eight years old at the time of trial, was a proper exercise of discretion, since the record of the voir dire reflects that the child had the requisite intelligence and capacity to testify at trial and understood the nature and consequence of the oath (see, People v Parks,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
