1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 141 F.3d
  5. 141 F.3d 412 (1998)
 

HEMPHILL v. SCHOTT

Docket No. 96-2793.

141 F.3d 412 (1998)

John HEMPHILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold SCHOTT, NYC Police Officer; Thomas DiMuro, NYC Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided April 10, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alicia Wade, New York City (Douglas F. Broder, Coudert Brothers, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Julian L. Kalkstein, Assistant Corporation Counsel, New York City (Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of City of New York, Larry A. Sonnenshein and Elizabeth A. Wright, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before OAKES and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and BRIEANT, District Judge.

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:

John Hemphill appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lewis A. Kaplan, Judge, granting summary judgment to Defendants Harold Schott and Thomas DiMuro, New York City police officers ["the Officers"], in a suit Hemphill brought against them under section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Acting pro se,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases