The appellant does not contest that he defaulted in the repayment of the subject loan. Moreover, the plaintiff presented evidentiary proof in admissible form which established its cause of action for foreclosure against the appellant, based upon the appellant's indebtedness of $175,630.38 plus interest, various taxes, and expenses (see, Zuckerman v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CAPITAL INVESTMENT COMPANY v. CUFFEE
256 A.D.2d 295 (1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 760
CAPITAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, Respondent, v. JAMES E. CUFFEE, Also Known as JIM CUFFEE, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 7, 1998.
Decided December 7, 1998.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.