Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner's contention that the proposed use of his property as a helipad required no zoning approval and is not subject to General Business Law § 249 is without merit.
The zoning district in which the petitioner's property is located does not allow a helipad as an accessory use (see, Town of East Fishkill Zoning Law, District B-1, Accessory Uses), nor is the proposed use a customary accessory...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
