SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. F.C.C.

No. 97-1425.

138 F.3d 410 (1998)

SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC., et al., Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, AT&T Corporation, et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 20, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael K. Kellogg argued the cause for appellants, with whom James D. Ellis, Robert M. Lynch, San Antonio, TX, and Martin E. Grambow, Washington, DC, were on the briefs.

Christopher J. Wright, General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, argued the cause for appellee, with whom William E. Kennard, General Counsel, John E. Ingle, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and James M. Carr, Counsel, Washington, DC, were on the brief.

David W. Carpenter argued the cause for intervenors AT&T Corporation, et al., with whom Mark E. Haddad, Peter D. Keisler, Washington, DC, Mark C. Rosenblum, Roy E. Hoffinger, Basking Ridge, NJ, Anthony C. Epstein, Sue D. Blumenfeld, Washington, DC, Michael Finn, Leon Kestenbaum, Jay Keithley, Washington, DC, Charles C. Hunter, Catherine M. Hannan, Bowie, MD, Glenn B. Manishin, Washington, DC, Christy C. Kunn, John D. Windhausen, Jr., Silver Spring, MD, Gary M. Cohen, Jeffrey Blumenfeld, Genevieve Morelli, Alexandria, VA, Danny E. Adams, Steven A. Augustino, Washington, DC, Richard J. Metzger, Arlington, VA, Emily M. Williams, Daniel L. Brenner, Neal M. Goldberg, David L. Nicoll, Werner K. Hartenberger, Laura H. Phillips, and J.G. Harrington Washington, DC, were on the brief. Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. Washington, DC, entered an appearance.

Mickey S. Moon, Assistant Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, was on the brief for intervenor Office of the Oklahoma Attorney General

Jeffrey W. Sarles, Chicago, IL, was on the brief for amicus curiae Ameritech Corporation.

James R. Young and Michael E. Glover, Arlington, VA, were on the brief for intervenors Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies and Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc.

Before: SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Appellant SBC Communications contends that in denying its application to provide long-distance telephone service in the State of Oklahoma, the Federal Communications Commission has erroneously interpreted the provisions governing Bell operating company entry into the long-distance market in their home region states (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(1)(A), (B)). We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases