MATTER OF ROMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK


254 A.D.2d 292 (1998)

678 N.Y.S.2d 274

In the Matter of James Roman, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 5, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the denial of leave to serve a late notice of claim was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Shapiro v Town of Clarkstown, 238 A.D.2d 498). The record indicates that the respondents had no prior knowledge of many of the claims interposed. Moreover, the petitioner's excuses for failing to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases